Entries in dayton flyers (13)

Thursday
Jun242010

Your Government Hard at Work

H.RES.1456 -- Whereas the University of Dayton Flyers men's basketball team won their first National Invitation Tournament basketball championship in 1962, and their second in 1968; (Introduced in House - IH)

HRES 1456 IH

111th CONGRESS

2d Session

H. RES. 1456

Congratulating the University of Dayton men's basketball team for winning the 2010 National Invitation Tournament basketball championship.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

June 21, 2010

Mr. TURNER (for himself, Mr. AUSTRIA, Ms. FUDGE, Mr. JORDAN of Ohio, Mr. LATTA, Mrs. SCHMIDT, Mr. TIBERI, Mr. BOEHNER, Ms. SUTTON, Mr. WILSON of Ohio, Ms. KAPTUR, Mr. RYAN of Ohio, Ms. KILROY, Mr. LATOURETTE, Mr. DRIEHAUS, Mr. KUCINICH, Mr. SPACE, and Mr. BOCCIERI) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor 


RESOLUTION

Congratulating the University of Dayton men's basketball team for winning the 2010 National Invitation Tournament basketball championship.

Whereas, on April 1, 2010, the University of Dayton Flyers men's basketball team won its third National Invitation Tournament basketball championship in school history;

Whereas the University of Dayton Flyers men's basketball team won their first National Invitation Tournament basketball championship in 1962, and their second in 1968;

Whereas the University of Dayton Flyers men's basketball team has 40 all-time victories in the National Invitation Tournament, second only to St. John's University in Queens, New York;

Whereas the University of Dayton Flyers men's basketball team has three regular season conference championships and one conference tournament championship since joining the Atlantic 10 Conference in 1995;

Whereas in addition to their success on the court, the University of Dayton men's basketball team upholds a high standard of academic excellence, achieving an overall graduation success rate of 100 percent every year since Brian Gregory was named head coach in 2003;

Whereas the University of Dayton Flyers men's basketball team won the championship game by defeating the 2009 NCAA Tournament National Champion University of North Carolina Tar Heels 79 to 68;

Whereas the roster of the championship Flyer team included Mickey Perry, London Warren, Rob Lowery, Chris Johnson, Dan Fox, Josh Parker, Paul Williams, Luke Fabrizius, Luke Hendrick, Logan Nourse, Marcus Johnson, Chris Wright, Devin Searcy, Matt Kavanaugh, Peter Zestermann, Kurt Huelsman, and Josh Benson;

Whereas head coach Brian Gregory and his coaching staff, including assistant coaches Billy Schmidt, Jon Borovich, and Cornell Mann, director of basketball operations Matt Farrell, strength and conditioning coach Mike Bewley, and athletic trainer Nate Seymour deserve tremendous credit for their outstanding determination and accomplishments; and

Whereas the students, alumni, administration, faculty, and supporters of the University of Dayton are to be congratulated for their loyalty and pride in their championship caliber basketball team: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives--

(1) congratulates the University of Dayton men's basketball team for winning the 2010 National Invitation Tournament Division I men's basketball championship; and

(2) recognizes the achievements of the players, coaches, students, and support staff who were instrumental in the Flyers' victory.

Wednesday
Mar172010

NIT Wishlists

Tuesday
Mar092010

You are not your Khakis

Boo awayI wasn't going to throw my two cents in on this whole "booing" issue (or non-issue, depending on your point of view), but then the Ice Trucker had to go and write an article about it.

Archdeacon's overriding concern? "Is it wrong for UD Arena fans to boo the Flyers?"

In a word, no. Absolutely not. The University of Dayton men's basketball program is a for-profit business. UD basketball is a product -- nothing more, nothing less. There is a budget, there are financial records, and there are contractual obligations associated with running a high-level D1 college basketball program. Those 13,000 people cramming into UD Arena for every game? Those are customers, they are there for entertainment purposes. UD basketball is a respite from their everyday doldrums. If you think college sports in general is anything but a money grab, I'm not sure what to tell you. College sports are simply another vehicle through which to sell advertising and overpriced soft drinks. College basketball is simply another entity that gamblers can spend billions wagering on.  

Then, there is this outdated notion -- quoting the Arch: "One camp says you don’t boo 18 to 22 year olds. They aren’t pros, they don’t get paid and they are trying their best."

True, UD's basketball players are not technically professionals. However, they are not amateurs either. Perhaps "semi-professional" is the most appropriate manner in which to label them. There is a bargained for exchange between each scholarship athlete and the University of Dayton. In exchange for signing a contract (that's not very amateurish, now is it?) with UD, scholarship athletes are given free tuition, room and board, books, etc. (approximate value is probably in the neighborhood of $50,000.00) That's not even considering the extra perks that come with being an athlete: the offseason "jobs" paid in cash, scattered undergrad ass, papers written edited by tutors, and "loans" given to uncles of recruits.

Age is certainly not a concern, as no one would argue that it's wrong to boo a 20 year-old "kid" that plays for the Knicks:

20-year old financially compensated to play for the New York Knicks: boo-able!

20-year old financially compensated to play for the University of Dayton: not boo-able!

So, that argument goes right out the window -- which means it basically comes down to the corporation that is padding its pockets with the talents of predominantly young black men. Why people draw a distinction between Knicks basketball and UD basketball is beyond me. Both are economic machines focused on their bottom lines, concerned with profits. Why would it be okay to boo John Wall the 20 year old guard for the Clippers, but not John Wall the 19 year old guard for the University of Kentucky? Because he is better compensated? Someone help me out here.

Thursday
Feb252010

Rumor Du Jour

Get me away, I'm dyingLet me state emphatically, I am not addressing the veracity of this e-mail. This rumor been floating around since the DePaul job opened up. Just food for thought:

Ok – word I just got from someone pretty into UD athletics is that Gregory is gone – deal is sealed with DePaul…even better news...We will get one of duke’s asst coaches – with the agreement of a ud /duke game on the schedule in 2 years.

Again, file this info under dangerous rumor for now. This email is coming from the same source that tipped me off to the Stevie Thomas transfer days before it appeared anywhere. When I asked whether or not this rumor has legs, the source said, "I really don't know." So, yeah, grain of salt.

This, by the way, is what happens when the season implodes -- sites like ours turn into College Basketball TMZ.

 

Wednesday
Feb242010

The Bell Tolls for UD 

"This is the part where I go off for the last time this year. The thoughts have to leave my head for me to move on back to real life.

I want to be the guy that hands these seniors their diplomas. I have to make sure they're really out of eligibility. Kurt and London are summer flings. Fine for what they are, and there were those few times where she really used her tongue well, but come late August it's time to move on and she disappears from your mind. Marcus was great for a while, but turned crazy. Maybe down the road the fond memories will come back. Mickey Perry was the fat friend, just always there for no apparent reason. Lowery, well, yeah. He played.

What a disappointing senior class.

I really hope BG is just punting this season with the way he's coaching. I know he's a system guy, but there's a difference between sticking to the system and just watching the old lady walk out in front of the bus. I think the worst part for me is the fact that he's taking no responsibility in the press (Doog). Maybe Doog's just not asking the questions the Trucker wants asked (your job now Secaur).

Wait till next year!!!!

I actually think next year will be better than this one, if for no other reason than lowered expectations. I've seen Staten many times, and he's just that damn good. Josh Parker was pretty good at Drake. Between (likely) progression from Benson, Paul Willie, Kavanaugh, a straight beast mode CJ and the rest of the freshmen I think the team will be far more talented. If, and it's a BIG IF, BG can tweak the system to match the smaller, more guard oriented roster I think the Flyers can be pretty damn good. If this year has taught me anything, it's that talent simply matters more than age and experience.

I'm sitting the next couple weeks out. I'll watch, but I won't care about the result. When Xavier rolls Richmond on Saturday it will make any potential win over the Spiders mean far less, so the season all comes down to AC. That's when I'll care again."

-- Adam

Effective Field Goal Percentage (eFG%): adjusts for the fact that a 3-point field goal is worth one more point than a 2-point field goal.
Turnover Percentage (TO%): is an estimate of turnovers per 100 plays.
Offensive Rebouning Percentage (OR%): measures a team's ability to get offensive rebounds.
Free Throw Rate (FT Rate): is a measure of both how often a team gets to the line and how often they make them.



SMINPTSFGMFGAFG%2PA2PA2P%3PM3PA3P%FTMFTAFT%ORDRREBASTSTLBLKTOPF
Dayton C. Wright * 30 12 4 11 36.4 4 10 40.0 0 1 0.0 4 5 80.0 3 10 13 0 1 0 1 1
Dayton R. Lowery * 27 7 2 9 22.2 0 5 0.0 2 4 50.0 1 2 50.0 0 3 3 3 1 0 4 4
Dayton M. Johnson * 25 4 2 5 40.0 2 5 40.0 0 0
0 0
1 3 4 2 2 1 0 3
Dayton K. Huelsman * 24 3 1 8 12.5 1 8 12.5 0 0
1 2 50.0 0 7 7 0 0 1 2 1
Dayton L. Warren * 18 2 1 3 33.3 1 3 33.3 0 0
0 0
1 4 5 2 0 0 2 4
Dayton C. Johnson
23 3 1 4 25.0 0 0 0.0 1 4 25.0 0 0
2 1 3 1 0 0 1 1
Dayton P. Williams
18 3 1 4 25.0 0 1 0.0 1 3 33.3 0 0
0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2
Dayton M. Perry
15 4 2 5 40.0 2 4 50.0 0 1 0.0 0 0
1 1 2 2 0 0 0 4
Dayton D. Searcy
9 0 0 4 0.0 0 4 0.0 0 0
0 0
2 2 4 0 0 1 1 1
Dayton L. Fabrizius
8 3 1 4 25.0 0 0 0.0 1 4 25.0 0 0
1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0
Dayton J. Benson
3 0 0 0
0 0 0.0 0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

UD
200 41 15 57 26.3 10 40 25.0 5 17 29.4 6 9 66.7 12 33 45 10 5 3 12 21


S MIN PTS FGM FGA FG% 2PA 2PA 2P% 3PM 3PA 3P% FTM FTA FT% OR DR REB AST STL BLK TO PF

TU
200 49 17 53 32.1 15 38 39.4 2 15 13.3 13 21 61.9 11 31 42 13 5 4 8 13
Temple L. Allen * 39 9 3 8 37.5 3 7 42.8 0 1 0.0 3 5 60.0 4 13 17 3 0 3 0 3
Temple R. Brooks * 37 11 5 12 41.7 5 9 55.5 0 3 0.0 1 2 50.0 0 3 3 1 1 0 2 1
Temple R. Moore * 30 13 4 12 33.3 4 10 40.0 0 2 0.0 5 6 83.3 2 1 3 1 0 0 1 0
Temple L. Guzman * 27 2 0 4 0.0 0 1 0.0 0 3 0.0 2 4 50.0 0 3 3 7 2 0 0 2
Temple M. Eric * 13 4 2 4 50.0 2 4 50.0 0 0
0 0
2 2 4 0 1 0 1 3
Temple J. Fernandez
28 7 2 8 25.0 0 3 0.0 2 5 40.0 1 2 50.0 0 2 2 1 1 0 2 3
Temple R. Jefferson
25 3 1 4 25.0 1 4 25.0 0 0
1 2 50.0 2 4 6 0 0 1 1 1
Temple C. Williams
1 0 0 1 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 1 0.0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Monday
Feb152010

The Cheatsheet 

Monday
Feb082010

The Bloody Struggle in the Hexagon

Handsome Joe Lunardi disclosed, via his Twitter account, that he will more than likely have six A-10 teams when his bracket projection comes out later today. This is a direct result of the PAC-10’s continual abortion of a season and the A-10 splitting into two distinct factions, a suitable six and whatever else lies at the bottom of the Atlantic Ten barrel. Conceivably, the A-10 is going to finish with several teams in the 12-4/11-5 range, so the latter half of the league schedule will clearly determine who will play their way into, and out of, a bid.

At this stage of the season two things should be crystal clear: first, you cannot afford to lose to a team outside of the top six of the league. Out of the current top six, only Dayton (@ St. Joe’s) and Richmond (@ Saint Louis) have lost to bottom feeders. A loss to the bottom half of the league could serve as a nail in the coffin from here on out, as the top six of the league takes turns beating each other up. Second, the chances of the league receiving six (even five) bids are spurious at best. So many variables would have to fall into place for that scenario to occur that it’s not even worth talking about at this point. Considering this website once spent a week discussing women’s leggings that is saying a mouthful.

If we are operating under the assumption that the league is presently worthy of six bids, and for our purposes here, we are, it may be beneficial (just nod yes) to take a peek at what lies ahead for the league’s hexagon of power. Who has the easiest road ahead? Which team faces an uphill battle? It’s quite possible that a week or two from now one of these teams will have played its way out of the discussion. The schedules may provide a clue, or at the very least allow us to pretend that the picture is somewhat clearer.

Teams are presented in order of scheduling ease. The analysis gives each team an overtly favorable benefit of doubt.

1) Dunphy is sitting prettyTemple: The Owls appear to have the easiest slate of games left on the docket. With only two games against teams in the hexagon (Dayton and Rhode Island), both at home, Temple would realistically only need to split them to have the inside track on first place. After this weekend’s game against Rhode Island, Dunphy’s squad has a pair of very winnable games against St. Bonaventure and St. Joseph’s before UD comes calling later this month. After the Dayton tilt, Temple’s closes the season out with three games against squads that are currently a combined 10-16 in the league. Lastly, Temple does not have to deal with the pressure of playing crucial games back-to-back; they have an advantageously arranged path ahead of them.

2) Xavier: After traveling to Gainesville for an out-of-conference clash with the Florida Gators (which I’m not quite sure will have a major effect on the Muskies’ hopes win or lose), Xavier returns to take on St. Joseph’s. A win against the Hawks puts the Musketeers at nine wins on the season. Even if X only wins one game out of their next three (@Charlotte, @Saint Louis and vs. Richmond), they would have registered ten wins with just two conference games remaining. Those two opponents? The resigned Rams of Fordham and the dormant Bonnies of Saint Bonaventure. Sweep those two teams under the rug and Xavier reaches 12 wins without breaking a sweat. X fans are right to be satisfied with their remaining table.  Only two games in the hexagon and a pair of gimmies to close out the campaign. That’s fairly smooth sailing for our overlords.

3) Rhode Island: If Rhody can take out Richmond this week, their path to an at-large bid seems like it could be all but locked up. On the other hand, if the Rams lose two games this week – very possible considering they face Richmond and Temple – they will get booted from the hexagon (which I guess becomes a pentagon?). If the Rams can go 1-1, a trio of very winnable games awaits them (@Saint Louis, Fordham and @St. Bonaventure). Under this scenario, Rhody would have 11 wins going into games against Charlotte and UMass. Another split at the end of the season brings their win total to a beatific 12. So, Rhody’s formula for success looks something like this: split-three-split. Not exactly catchy, but neither was Bob Dylan and he uses a diamond fork to eat his tabouleh.

4) Dan and Luke need you to believe in themDayton: The Flyers were able to stave off their execution with an impressive win over Xavier this weekend, maybe you heard about it. Out of all six teams, Dayton has the most ground to make up as they are currently 1.5 games out of fifth place.  UD is the outlier in the hexagon, as they cannot afford a single slip-up outside the top six. A loss to Saint Louis, Duquesne or La Salle could signal their dismissal from the conference elite (by the way, elite is in no way an operative word in this case). As previously stated, only Dayton and Richmond have losses outside the top six, and the Spiders are unlikely to lose another game outside the hexagon.

A huge opportunity awaits the Flyers this Wednesday, as Charlotte comes to town (the 10th is going to be a busy day in the six-sided circle, as UD faces off against the Niners, and Richmond grapples with Rhode Island). A loss wouldn’t necessarily be catastrophic, given the opponent, but a 5-4 record on its face does not inspire confidence for the future. Even with a loss this Wednesday, UD has a three-pack of games that are winnable by reasonable standards: @Saint Louis, La Salle and @Duquesne. A clean sweep, however improbable, would place the Flyers at 8-4 with four games to go. Unfortunately, the Flyers have a tough close to the season, including two hexagonal contests on the road (Temple & Richmond). Winning 3-of-4 could be enough to keep the Flyers in the tournament conversation, as UD would have an 11-5 conference record with decent indicators (RPI, SOS, etc.).

Although I wouldn’t feel as comfortable labeling the Charlotte game a “must-win” as I was with Xavier, a loss to the 49ers would certainly inch UD closer to the edge of the ledge. As senseless as it may sound, 6-3 is a world away from 5-4. Even the most hopeful among us would have a hard time believing Dayton could pick itself up after a loss on Wednesday and run close to perfect over the last seven conference games.

5) Charlotte: The Niners have their work cut out for them, as half of their remaining games take place in the homoerotic frenzy of the hexagon. Nevertheless, the 49ers have put themselves in a very enviable position. At 8-1, Charlotte has the most room for error. Discounting games against the top six, Jim Utter’s team faces squads that have a combined record of 8-19. Assuming Shamari Spears and Co. take care of business against its lesser foes, Charlotte would only need to win one-of- four against the top six to end up with 12 wins in the league. Splitting the four games in the hexagon would likely mean a 13-3 mark for Charlotte. So even though Bobby Lutz’s club faces one of the toughest roads from here on out, they are probably sitting the prettiest at this point. A win against Dayton all but sews up an at-large bid for Charlotte.

6) Richmond: As much as it pains me to say it, Richie appears to have the rockiest road ahead.  The Spiders face four games in the ring, three of which are on the road. Outside of Dayton, no team can afford a loss to a bottom-feeder less than the Spiders. Wednesday’s tilt with Rhode Island will either provide Richmond with some breathing room or paint them into a corner. A victory over the Rams could see Richmond roll off four straight victories in route to an 11-2 record (after URI, Richmond faces the Bonnies, Fordham and GW). Richie’s schedule is difficult simply because of the way it is laid out. If they do not care take of business over the next two weeks, they face a murder’s row to close out the season. The prospect of taking two out of three from Xavier, Dayton and Charlotte is a daunting task for any club in the league – even more so when a potential bid is on the line.   

Sunday
Feb072010

The Cheat Sheet

Saturday
Feb062010

Live Blog: Xavier @ Dayton

Sunday
Jan312010

The Cheat Sheet + A request 

Also, I inadvertently deleted an email from a reader this week. Whoever wrote to me about the Finn t-shirt, email me if you are still interested. It'll look something like the one below, only with "54" and "Finn" on it.