Same Old, Same Old
March 4, 2010
Harry Baujan
Caveat emptor, Mr. Wabler.Where to start with this game? Everything about this one was pretty predictable: Kevin Anderson got his (22 points, 4 assists, 3 rebounds), David Gonzalvez was clutch down the stretch, UD out rebounded a team (43-25) but turned the ball over too many times (20) to make it count. You cannot expect to win a tough road game when you shoot 34% from the field and turn the ball over 20 times, it is as simple as that. With that being said, I'm gonna go ahead and list out my observations from this game. I know that most of these are going to be very profound, original ideas to everyone, so here they are:
1.) Kevin Anderson is really fucking good at the game of basketball. If it weren't for a guy by the name of JC, Anderson would definitely be in the running for POY in the A-10. The guy is one of the purest shooters in the league and can beat the quickest of quick (London) off the dribble at will. The shots that this guy was creating, you cannot even get mad about. There is hope that between Parker and Staten we'll have a PG that is a legit scoring threat, isn't there?
2.) Screw the zone, teams should be putting full court pressure on the Flyers the entire game. This team is constantly trying to go 100 mph and as a result averages almost 15 turnovers a game. As we have seen with most games, the Flyer's backcourt does not take care of the rock and seems to panic when faced with a full court pressure scheme.
3.) Dan Geriot is eerily similar to the old, sweaty guy that tries far too hard during a pick up game at the local Y. I mean between the hiked up shorts, the baggy white undershirt, and being white, he has that role pegged to a T. It really is a shame that he blew out his ACL because that old man used to be able to play.
4.) Did Chris Wright miss the bus to Richmond? I'm not sure where he was for this game, because he for damn sure was not out on the court. For being the leader of this team, he needs to realize that his teammates are relying on him to take charge in a must win game on the road against a formidable opponent.
5.) The Big Dog is soon to be emaciated because no one will let him eat. I lost track after about 4 or 5, the amount of times that Big Dog was waving his hands in the air, as to say, "Hey guys, I'm wide fucking open, pass me the damn ball." This team must have a phobia of passing the ball in to the post, because it never happens. You cannot expect the perimeter to open up if you only swing the ball around the top. Dump the ball into the post every once in a blue moon and see what happens, I think you'll be happy with the result, BG.
6.) I've been weary about taking my shots at BG all season because I think no matter what, it is the players on the court that prosper or fail. There were two things that I didn't like from him this game. One being his inability to draw up successful sets coming out of a dead ball, and two being at the beginning of the last Flyer timeout, the camera zoomed in on the UD huddle and you could visibly see BG say, "Alright, who's in?" Less than a minute left, down three and you don't know who you have on the court? Remove your head from your rectum, Mr. Gregory.
Artist rendering of Geriot7.) I did not know that it was possible to have uglier cheerleaders than UD. I think Richmond might take the cake on this one. If I'm not mistaken, there was one, MAYBE two, respectable looking girls. Kudos to the perv camera man who did an up-skirt shot of THE attractive cheerleader.
8.) How long until it comes out that For-three-zius' knee injury is far worse than any of us thought and has to go under the knife? Once we are officially invited to the NIT or scrap him now? Clearly this is far worse than originally reported. With the Flyers seeing zones left and right, you would think that The Lukeness Monster would be out there for more than three minutes. Put the lack of defense and athleticism aside, the kid can flat out shoot and needs to be out there against these zones.
9.) The Flyers got JC'd against a team that does not start with X. Just as Crawford did to London Warren at the end of the game at the Cintas Center, there was nothing that MJ could do to stop David Gonzalvez as he hit fadeaways with a hand in his eye. Gonzalvez decided to find his jumper at halftime, and coupled with Anderson's stellar play, that was enough to spur the Spiders on to victory.
10.) 20 offensive rebounds is quite impressive. The announcers kept marveling at this statistic. The thing that they did not focus on was what caused these rebounds: missed shots. So yes, Kurt and CJ were crashing the offensive glass, but its pretty easy to snag 5 offensive boards when your team only shoots 34% from the field.
The sad part about this Flyer team is that when they showed the graphic of the A-10 tournament bracket, I could not even convince myself that they have a chance of snagging the A-10 auto bid. No matter where the Flyers end up in the bracket, I do not see them beating any of the top four teams in the second round. Sure they are capable of it, but with a team that is so wildly inconsistent it's hard to expect the right team to show up.
I can't wait for this team to blow SLU out to get their 20th win of the season so that BG can add another twenty-win season to his resume, and make the university and some fans alike think that BG is a great coach and the right coach for the future. If anyone is interested in the NIT pizza party, please send your information to Mr. Donoher as he will be organizing the event.
I'm not sure which is a bigger surprise to me, that the Flyers are likely not going to be in the NCAA tourney after returning 10 guys or that I was able to come up with 1,100 words after that painful loss. I guess its perfect timing for Spring Training to start...
Effective Field Goal Percentage (eFG%): adjusts for the fact that a 3-point field goal is worth one more point than a 2-point field goal.
Turnover Percentage (TO%): is an estimate of turnovers per 100 plays.
Offensive Rebouning Percentage (OR%): measures a team's ability to get offensive rebounds.
Free Throw Rate (FT Rate): is a measure of both how often a team gets to the line and how often they make them.
| S | MIN | PTS | FGM | FGA | FG% | 2PA | 2PA | 2P% | 3PM | 3PA | 3P% | FTM | FTA | FT% | OR | DR | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | PF | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. Wright | * | 32 | 6 | 1 | 7 | 14.3 | 1 | 7 | 14.2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 100.0 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 2 | ||
| L. Warren | * | 25 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 66.7 | 2 | 3 | 66.6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | |||
| K. Huelsman | * | 24 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 40.0 | 2 | 5 | 40.0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 60.0 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | ||
| M. Johnson | * | 19 | 10 | 3 | 9 | 33.3 | 2 | 7 | 28.5 | 1 | 2 | 50.0 | 3 | 4 | 75.0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | |
| R. Lowery | * | 19 | 9 | 2 | 7 | 28.6 | 1 | 3 | 33.3 | 1 | 4 | 25.0 | 4 | 5 | 80.0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2 | |
| C. Johnson | 26 | 13 | 5 | 10 | 50.0 | 2 | 4 | 50.0 | 3 | 6 | 50.0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |||
| M. Perry | 17 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 16.7 | 1 | 2 | 50.0 | 0 | 4 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | |||
| P. Williams | 16 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 33.3 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | 1 | 2 | 50.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |||
| D. Searcy | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | |||||
| J. Benson | 6 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 50.0 | 1 | 2 | 50.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| L. Fabrizius | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| UD | 200 | 56 | 18 | 53 | 34.0 | 12 | 35 | 34.2 | 6 | 18 | 33.3 | 14 | 19 | 73.7 | 20 | 24 | 44 | 9 | 5 | 2 | 20 | 19 | ||
| S | MIN | PTS | FGM | FGA | FG% | 2PA | 2PA | 2P% | 3PM | 3PA | 3P% | FTM | FTA | FT% | OR | DR | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | PF | ||
| RICH | 200 | 60 | 20 | 47 | 42.6 | 14 | 29 | 48.2 | 6 | 18 | 33.3 | 14 | 20 | 70.0 | 6 | 19 | 25 | 11 | 14 | 3 | 12 | 18 | ||
| K. Anderson | * | 38 | 22 | 6 | 14 | 42.9 | 5 | 11 | 45.4 | 1 | 3 | 33.3 | 9 | 10 | 90.0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| D. Gonzalvez | * | 37 | 14 | 6 | 11 | 54.5 | 4 | 5 | 80.0 | 2 | 6 | 33.3 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
| R. Butler | * | 36 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 20.0 | 1 | 2 | 50.0 | 0 | 3 | 0.0 | 5 | 6 | 83.3 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 5 | 3 | |
| J. Harper | * | 31 | 13 | 5 | 8 | 62.5 | 2 | 5 | 40.0 | 3 | 3 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | ||
| D. Garrett | * | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | ||||
| K. Smith | 17 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 25.0 | 1 | 3 | 33.3 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | ||
| D. Geriot | 16 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 25.0 | 1 | 3 | 33.3 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | |||
| F. Martel | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5 | |||||
| D. Brothers | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
david gonzalvez,
kevin anderson,
recap,
richmond 


















